Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
work:semana_9_de_2022 [2022/03/02 14:24] – [Research] magsilvawork:semana_9_de_2022 [2022/03/02 18:01] – magsilva
Line 10: Line 10:
       * Considering the role congruity theory, they predicted the evaluation of code reviews of code which was authored by a person that "belongs to a group whose stereotypes do not align with the perceived qualities of a successful programmer or software engineering."  The stereotype was modeled considering three dimensions: gender, race/ethnicity, and age.       * Considering the role congruity theory, they predicted the evaluation of code reviews of code which was authored by a person that "belongs to a group whose stereotypes do not align with the perceived qualities of a successful programmer or software engineering."  The stereotype was modeled considering three dimensions: gender, race/ethnicity, and age.
       * For dependable variable, they considered "the perception of unnecessary interpersonal conflict in code review while a reviewer is blocking a chance request", which is named as pushback. A pushback is identified by excessive chance requests and approval withholding of code review. That was measured by the number of review rounds, amount of time spent by reviewers, and amount of time spent by the code author addressing the reviewers' concern.       * For dependable variable, they considered "the perception of unnecessary interpersonal conflict in code review while a reviewer is blocking a chance request", which is named as pushback. A pushback is identified by excessive chance requests and approval withholding of code review. That was measured by the number of review rounds, amount of time spent by reviewers, and amount of time spent by the code author addressing the reviewers' concern.
 +      * Results: "Women [code] authors face higher odds of pushback than men; Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latinx [code] authors face higher odds than White authors; and older [code] authors face higher odds than younger authors."
 +      * Confounding factors not accounted for: language spoken by code authors, code quality in the change under review.
 +    * Next was. Oddly, the PDF retrieved from ACM DL was incomplete (it has just the first page), but I could read the whole paper using ACM DL  reader. 
 +      * Although we often focus on introductory programming classes, there is also the problem of learning to program in a second (or third :-) programming language. That is the issue this paper tackles.
 +      * The authors used a mixed- method research method, comprising analysis of questions posed at StackOverflow and semistructured interviews.