Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
work:semana_9_de_2022 [2022/03/02 14:24] – [Research] magsilva | work:semana_9_de_2022 [2022/03/02 18:22] – [Research] magsilva | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Considering the role congruity theory, they predicted the evaluation of code reviews of code which was authored by a person that " | * Considering the role congruity theory, they predicted the evaluation of code reviews of code which was authored by a person that " | ||
* For dependable variable, they considered "the perception of unnecessary interpersonal conflict in code review while a reviewer is blocking a chance request", | * For dependable variable, they considered "the perception of unnecessary interpersonal conflict in code review while a reviewer is blocking a chance request", | ||
+ | * Results: "Women [code] authors face higher odds of pushback than men; Asian, Black, and Hispanic/ | ||
+ | * Confounding factors not accounted for: language spoken by code authors, code quality in the change under review. | ||
+ | * Next was. Oddly, the PDF retrieved from ACM DL was incomplete (it has just the first page), but I could read the whole paper using ACM DL reader. | ||
+ | * Although we often focus on introductory programming classes, there is also the problem of learning to program in a second (or third :-) programming language. That is the issue this paper tackles. | ||
+ | * The authors used a mixed- method research method, comprising analysis of questions posed at StackOverflow and semistructured interviews. Regarding the questions at StackOverflow, | ||
+ | * There are evidence that cross-language interference occurs: for some language pairs, there are more misconceptions; | ||
+ | * Differently from novice programmers, |