Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
work:semana_9_de_2022 [2022/03/02 14:42] – [Research] magsilvawork:semana_9_de_2022 [2022/03/02 18:01] magsilva
Line 12: Line 12:
       * Results: "Women [code] authors face higher odds of pushback than men; Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latinx [code] authors face higher odds than White authors; and older [code] authors face higher odds than younger authors."       * Results: "Women [code] authors face higher odds of pushback than men; Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latinx [code] authors face higher odds than White authors; and older [code] authors face higher odds than younger authors."
       * Confounding factors not accounted for: language spoken by code authors, code quality in the change under review.       * Confounding factors not accounted for: language spoken by code authors, code quality in the change under review.
 +    * Next was. Oddly, the PDF retrieved from ACM DL was incomplete (it has just the first page), but I could read the whole paper using ACM DL  reader. 
 +      * Although we often focus on introductory programming classes, there is also the problem of learning to program in a second (or third :-) programming language. That is the issue this paper tackles.
 +      * The authors used a mixed- method research method, comprising analysis of questions posed at StackOverflow and semistructured interviews.